Archive for Organic Fertilizer
September 9, 2010 · Filed under california agriculture, California Water Drought Issue, fertilizer, Organic Fertilizer, Uncategorized, Water Conservation · Tagged california, california agriculture, California Water Supply, Central Coast Farmers, fertilizer, growers, NRCS, Organic Fertilizer, reduced water supply, USDA
For the last couple of years, we have been creating and residing in a Delta vs. Ag tug of war that, for each side, has its own financial and biological purposes which are extremely important.
The root of this quarrel resides in the ever growing in intensity battle with water. Water in areas such as San Joaquin, Coachella, Fresno, among others is becoming more and more scarce. Finding new ways to deal with the water we have has already proved to be a more effective, and more productive method.
Thus, the Central Valley Regional Water Quality Control Board, has devoted itself to creating four, public workshops in which will allow those attendees to place their opinions on the most recent release of the draft program environmental impact report.
Starting soon, September 8, 2010 from 5 to 8pm the County Farm Bureau in Tulare will be accepting comments from growers who attend these workshops.
The comment period for the growers that attend is intended to provide the opportunity for those who deal with the issue of water regulations every day to voice their opinions on expanding the regulated irrigation methods in agricultural. Being such that these individuals are the ones struggling to make a living for their families, and put food on the table for more than just themselves, it would only make sense to have them involved.
For those interested in attending and voicing their opinions, please go to www.waterboards.ca.gov.centralvalley.
September 7, 2010 · Filed under california agriculture, fertilizer, Organic Fertilizer · Tagged california, california agriculture, Central Coast Farmers, NRCS, USDA
When it comes to agriculture, many places among the U.S. come to mind. Places like California, a state in the Union that produces the fruit and vegetables for over 80% of the world. What doesn’t come to mind is places like such losing out on revenue due to imported product. Product that can be appraised at a lower selling value due to the requirements placed upon them.
Product coming from countries like Mexico and Peru are not currently required to meet the same regulations as crop coming from the United States. So, when John, a local Southern California grower wants to sell his asparagus to a buyer he’s met with the issue of competition offering the same crop, for a lower, undercut price.
When the grower is not required to regulate his pesticide and herbicide applications, or mandated to reach a certain safety ordinance, he can then grow his crop in the least expensive manner, bidding out growers like John who have abided by USDA regulations.
Another issue that factors into the over cost that is an increasingly persistent problem, is labor costs. Many crops are very labor intensive costing the grower several man hours to get the job done. When he then goes to sell his crop, he’s forced to factor in this cost, thus again getting him outbid by an imported product.
As these issues become more relevant and demanding, the American grower can only hope that organizations like the USDA step in and place stronger, fairer mandates on imported product. While a large amount of our specialty crop is exported out of the U.S. implementing such regulations can be tricky and potentially hazardous to the export market.
August 23, 2010 · Filed under california agriculture, California Water Drought Issue, fertilizer, Organic Fertilizer, Water Conservation · Tagged Agriculture, calcium 880, california, california agriculture, California Water Supply, Central Coast Farmers, Efficiency, fertilizer, growers, Organic Fertilizer, reduced water supply, USDA
When it comes to growing almonds, many had been facing challenges, whether they are organic or not. It has become increasingly difficult in recent years to compete with the foreign prices. The USDA has been enforcing, as of 2007, a law that required almond growers to make a postharvest treatment using either steam or chemicals to prevent a salmonella outbreak. This law was adopted in 2007 due to Salmonella outbreaks have previously been traced back to almonds in 2001 and 2004.
These regulations are making it very difficult for California almond growers to compete with foreign markets. Foreign markets are currently not regulated by the same laws, making it difficult for California growers to compete financially while having increased postharvest costs. In addition, there have been some who believe that the postharvest treatments performed on the raw almonds can have an impact on the flavor of the almonds. California almond growers supply roughly 85% of the world’s almonds.
Some think that organically produced raw almonds are much safer and cleaner due to the strict regulations that they must follow. One such regulation requires growers to keep animal waste away from the plant, and also prohibits the use of pesticides.
According to Dr. Robert S. Lawrence, a professor at the John Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, says that studies have shown that less than 1% of all almonds are contaminated by salmonella. He also points out that several other products have a much higher contamination rate. Regardless of these statements, we do know that foreign products are not subjected the same regulations as those grown in California, yet both compete for shelf space at the markets. Hopefully this will get sorted out shortly, so that our almond growers in California can get back to doing what they do best, producing an amazing harvest of almonds and providing a quality product worldwide.
April 29, 2010 · Filed under california agriculture, California Water Drought Issue, fertilizer, Organic Fertilizer, Uncategorized, Water Conservation · Tagged Agriculture, calcium 880, california, california agriculture, California Water Supply, Central Coast Farmers, Efficiency, fertilizer, news, Organic Fertilizer, reduced water supply, USDA
When it comes to water, the world generally doesn’t consider that we are in a problem. Unfortunately, only small areas of our country are realizing the crisis that is going on.
California, the nation’s leader in agricultural production also happens to rank as the nation’s top water user. While looking back on history, many different issues have been brought to attention over the years. One we have never really been concerned about until recently is our water. With the United States using approximately 400 billion gallons of water per day, it isn’t any wonder why we are now asking ourselves, “Where will it all come from?”
Out of that 400 billion gallons of water, about half, is allocated to create energy. With using this water for such uses, is then returned to its source be it river or reservoir. This would be classified as renewable energy, but where does the other 200 billion go?
Currently, Agriculture is the nation’s leading user in water consumption. Using more than 80 billion gallons per day, it is our main source that which we should try to cut back from.
Unfortunately many questions still rest unanswered. How can we be more efficient? How can we use less? How can we reuse what we have already used? How can we hold rainfall that isn’t being used affectively? These are all questions on the minds of many government leaders and agricultural dependants.
While looking into history, we can see many things that indicate a quality improvement in water consumption, yet it still is not enough. Between 1980 and 2000 the California Farm Bureau Federation reported that crop production increased by a whopping 35%. Seeing these production increases it would only make sense that water allocation would need to be increased, but this is not the case. With growers moving to more economical and efficient irrigation systems, along with using different types of fertilizer products like Ferticell, it ever increasingly tells us that there are steps to be taken to rid our over dependency on water.
Hopefully we can someday look back and recognize which methods we should have stepped forward to rectify more hastily like we are already doing today.
April 26, 2010 · Filed under california agriculture, California Water Drought Issue, fertilizer, Organic Fertilizer, Uncategorized · Tagged Agriculture, california agriculture, Central Coast Farmers, Efficiency, fertilizer, growers, news, Organic Fertilizer
Senator Dean Florez, has sponsored the SB 705 for quite some time now. For those not knowing what the SB 705 is, let’s give some background.
When growers are in need of removing agricultural waste, currently they are prone to burning this waste in ditches, banks, or anywhere it is safe from their crop. Doing so reduces cost which is ever so important in today’s California agricultural market with water allocations still low.
Due to SB 705, this practice is to be stopped with the exception for smaller, 20 acre or less farms. This exception was as a favor to the smaller growers in California which had been extended from May 2007 to 2010. The idea behind the exception was to allow the smaller growers to be able to seek out cost-effective alternatives to burning the waste.
Currently, those in control of the enforcement, The Air Pollution Control District, which is to be put into effect June 1will be holding a meeting on the waste burning May 20th, at 9:00 a.m. The meeting will be to decide on whether or not enforcement of the law will be placed into effect or if the extension on waste burning will be granted.
While we understand that there are reasonable arguments to both sides of this agenda, we encourage those affected to voice their opinion so that the community is best served.
If you are interested in voicing your opinion, via video feed at the Bakersfield District Office which address is below.
34946 Flyover Ct
Bakersfield, CA 93308 – http://maps.google.com/maps?q=34946+Flyover+Court&oe=utf-8&client=firefox-a&rlz=1R1GGLL_en___US365&um=1&ie=UTF-8&hq=&hnear=34946+Flyover+Ct,+Bakersfield,+CA+93308&gl=us&ei=MwTWS7vbC46iswOoneCTCg&sa=X&oi=geocode_result&ct=title&resnum=1&ved=0CAcQ8gEwAA
April 21, 2010 · Filed under california agriculture, California Water Drought Issue, fertilizer, Organic Fertilizer, Water Conservation · Tagged Agriculture, calcium 880, california, california agriculture, California Water Supply, growers, Organic Fertilizer, reduced water supply
When it comes to buying a tube of tooth paste or getting a cheeseburger, 5% more isn’t that big of a deal. But for those influenced in the San Joaquin Valley, 5% sounds like a blessing from heaven. In March, the water allocation for the southern valley growers was at 25%. While some see these numbers as still not enough, every inch helps for those directly affected.
Along with San Joaquin Valley, we are seeing other areas of the delta rising in water allocation. Ken Salazar, Secretary of the Interior has stated before and has again that they are pushing for another 8-10% for the area south of the Delta, approximately another 175,000 acre-feet.
While small increases aren’t ideal for perfect growing conditions for the area, we hope that receiving a bit more water will help push to keep San Joaquin on the agricultural map. While water allocations are minimal many growers can turn to other resources to help boost yields come harvest time. Agroplasma can tell you how to get the most out of the water that you are getting and give a boost to your crop.
April 19, 2010 · Filed under california agriculture, California Water Drought Issue, fertilizer, Organic Fertilizer, Water Conservation · Tagged Agriculture, california agriculture, California Water Supply, Central Coast Farmers, fertilizer, growers, Organic Fertilizer, reduced water supply, USDA
Californian farm families are in for another financial shock when it comes to electricity. In March, the gas & electric company, PG&E asked to boost California Public Utilities rates by another $43 million a year for the California farmer. This 7.1% increase in electricity and water is coming on top of the rise in rates in December when PG&E increased annual cost by $48 million. Therefore, in the last 6 months, PG&E will have increased rates by a whopping 13%.
Some speaking out are Michael Boccadoro, the Executive Director of the Agricultural Energy Consumers Association. He feels that such a raise in rates during one of the weakest moments in our economies history, where CA farm community unemployment sits at 18% is, “unconscionable”.
With water shortages and a slowly moving economy, farmers are forced to use more electricity just to pump the water. PG&E, who is making these price hikes are just the start to the ultimate goal of $835 million by 2011 with more increases being planned for 2012 & 2013.
Within the last 10 years, rates have climbed 41.7%. The PUC is planning on ruling for both requests for within the next 12 months. Farm families from all over the great state of CA will be joining with the AECA to fight the proposed rate hike at the CPUC.
March 26, 2010 · Filed under Arizona Agriculture, fertilizer, Organic Fertilizer · Tagged Agriculture, arizona farmer, arizona grower, arizona growers, fertilizer, growers, news, NRCS, Organic Fertilizer
When it comes to Arizona agriculture, many things come into play to keep the wheel going round. Thanks to special help like The University of Arizona Cooperative Extension and the Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS), many issues are being brought to the table. Arizona farmers and ranchers are hoping to get nice piece of assistance from those above along with getting assistance in the categories of; improvement of profits, and protection of the environment
The Cooperative Extension is a portion of a nationwide network of educators and scientists who are helping those like the Arizona grower solve problems and put knowledge to use.
In an effort to help improve natural resources, and the environment by providing leadership to help people do so, the NRCS is taking a partnered step forward in the right direction.
Pieces like the Professional Development Survey, is just one way for these groups to help determine overall desires of the AZ farmers and help them prosper.
For more information you may visit http://cals.arizona.edu/extension/sustainableag/.
Also, available is the example of the survey sent out here.
March 22, 2010 · Filed under Arizona Agriculture, california agriculture, California Water Drought Issue, fertilizer, Organic Fertilizer, Water Conservation · Tagged Agriculture, california agriculture, California Water Supply, Central Coast Farmers, growers, reduced water supply
Earlier this year I had written about EQUIP, and the great amount of funding that they had provided the California farmer by distributing a $10 million grant to California farmers, to assist them in converting to highly water-efficient micro-irrigation systems.
Today, I am writing again about EQUIP, or the Environmental Quality Incentives Program but on a less than favorable note. This March, members on the Agriculture and the Environment California Roundtable brought up complaints that the federal conservation program is being shifted by the Obama Administration’s budget proposal.
Such shifting allegations by the Round Table include $500 million from conservation programs. Directly, California would receive a $30 million cut, which had been made available from the 2008 farm bill.
Currently, the EQUIP program allows growers to apply for funds allowing them to update technology and equipment necessary to saving money, along with saving the environment. The program requires that the beneficiary match the total of amount money given to fund the endeavor.
So while conservation of water and California habitat has been a large discussion piece at many meetings, possibly may become a much more pressing issue. The EQUIP program had called for $1.55 billion in 2011 to be dispersed through eligible farmers, and would move up to $1.75 billion by 2012 now will be reduced to $1.4 billion by January 1st, 2011.
Moving further to budget cuts, Sen. Lincoln, who is the Senate Agriculture Committee chairman, has proposed additional cuts to the EQUIP program, that if initiated would cut the EQUIP funds to $1.2 billion.
While these allegations of budget cuts seem detrimental and substantially crippling to agricultural producers, those in the point of authority are stating differently.
Staffers and even an Arkansas Official stated that when receiving a proposed budget of $1.6 billion, producers are only receiving approximately $1.05 billion, which begs the question where did $.55 billion go? They stated that political pork projects attribute as an example as to where the money goes. The budget of the EQUIP at $1.6 billion may not be the “authorized level” of funding. So, with that unauthorized level of funding being used elsewhere, they are stating that these budget cuts will not happen, and producers will actually receive more funding.
As every farmer and grower, we are hoping that these statements are true, as EQUIP is an important funding that these California growers need in these tough times.
For more information on EQUIP you can visit http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/PROGRAMS/EQIP/.
February 8, 2010 · Filed under Arizona Agriculture, california agriculture, California Water Drought Issue, fertilizer, Organic Fertilizer, Water Conservation · Tagged Agriculture, calcium 880, california agriculture, fertilizer, growers, Organic Fertilizer, reduced water supply, USDA
After Obama’s State of the Union address on January 27th, a new program was initiated called the National Export Initiative. Commerce Secretary Gary Locke stated that, “This initiative will correct an economic blind spot that has allowed other countries to chip away at America’s international competitiveness.”
Putting millions of dollars toward helping farm producers will be something that had been tried in the past, yet never fully followed through on. President Obama had stated that he intends to double U.S. export within the next 5 years. With agriculture making up only 9% of total exportation from the U.S., the statistics showing how valuable that 9% is rather impressive.
For every $1 billion exported out of the U.S., it creates $1.4 billion in economic activity. The 9% of U.S. agro-export also has created a million plus jobs. So thus, doubling the export of America’s crop will inevitably double the million plus jobs, which also will greatly help the agricultural market.
Locke had stated as well that the USDA will increase it’s efforts to help producers to export. With new funding increasing to $54 million for exportation promotional efforts, it will be interesting to see what spin is put on the cabinet-level focus for the new U.S. export strategy.
In 2009 the U.S. exported $97 billion of agricultural products, if Obama would like to double that by 2015 as he has stated, that will require a spike of 200,000 jobs and $19.4 billion every year for the next 5 years. Lofty goals for the new president, and we can all only hope that we will achieve these goals soon enough!
